Picture a typical onboarding experience at your organization from a new hire’s perspective.
Three weeks before start date:
A candidate accepts their offer, and they’re thrilled. Then … crickets until a welcome email arrives the Friday before. HR did their part, technically, but the new hire spent those three weeks a little anxious, maybe even second-guessing their decision.
Day one:
Their laptop isn’t set up yet, so they sit for an hour watching everyone else work. Their manager is in back-to-back meetings all morning, so a teammate walks them to the bathrooms. They get little else in the way of training.
Day three:
The new hire has finished benefits enrollment and sat through compliance training but still doesn’t have access to the one system they need to do their job. No matter how kind their colleagues are, they don’t feel like they have a place here. Instead of early momentum, they feel like maybe they made the wrong call.
After the first week:
Nothing went wrong from the organization’s perspective. HR sent the welcome email. IT eventually provisioned the laptop. Every task was completed by someone, but on their own timeline, in their own system.
And that’s the problem with onboarding at many organizations.
Each department can point to their piece and say it worked. But the new hire experienced an organization that hadn’t gotten its act together before they joined — right when they were most looking for a reason to feel confident in their decision.
Onboarding can be perceived completely differently depending on whose perspective you’re viewing from, so many organizations don’t consider it a priority problem to solve. But disconnected onboarding comes with hidden costs, from both an employee experience standpoint and a financial health standpoint.